TV Box Chip RK3328 Vs. S912

0
672
rk3328 vs. s912
Credit: hometheatrelife.com

With the long-awaited arrival of Android TV boxes including Rock chip’s new quadcore RK3328 processor, everyone’s been considering how it looks at Amlogics famous octa-center Amlogic S912 SoC. Let’s contrast the RK3328 versus S912 with discovering which the best chipset is. In Amlogic S912 use Octa-center 64-digit ARM Cortex-A53 and Rockchip RK3328 go through Quad-Core Cortex-A53 to 1.5GHz.

For Video Decoding rk3328 vs. s912 is Amlogic S912 is 4K 60fps HW unraveling, upholds different organizations including H.265/VP9 10-digit, H.264 and AVS+ Supports HDR10 and HLG HDR handling FHD 1080p 60fps HW encoding, upholds H.265/H.264 and Rockchip RK3328 is 4K VP9 and 4K 10bit H265/H264 video decipher, up to 60fps 1080P other video decoders (VC-1, MPEG-1/2/4, VP8) Supports HDR10 and HLG HDR handling. Supports change among SDR and HDR 1080P video encoder for H.264 and H.265

Amlogic S912 Audio Processing is S/PDIF, I2S, and PCM info and yield, Stereo simple output, Digital sound system MIC information and Rockchip RK3328 is S/PDIF Audio DAC 8 channels I2S/PDM interface, upholds 8 channels Mic cluster.

The Amlogic S912 chipset is the more notable chip of the two, no doubt, a larger scheme with 8 Cortex-A53 ARM centers. These components operate at 4 centers running at 1.5Ghz and 4 low power stations running at 1Ghz. This Rockchip RK3328s runs on four Cortex-A53 ARM centers at 1.5GHz, which means that the Amlogic S912 will normally outperform the Rock chips processor in CPU-based tasks.

This means further developed execution when utilizing Android applications, exploring the UI, and other everyday errands. Both chipsets can decipher Ultra HD 4K video content at up to 60 casings each second for H.265, VP9, and H.264 video codecs. Moreover, full HD playback of VC-1, MPEG-1/2/4, and VP8 recordings are likewise upheld.

Both can likewise translate High Dynamic Range video (HDR) when associated with viable TVs for further developed picture quality. Both HDR10 and HLG designs are upheld. A similar cannot be said with Rockchip RK3328 gadgets that I’ve tried, with most games being scarcely playable besides the least difficult titles.

On the off chance that you’re a gamer, selecting an Android TV box fueled by the Amlogic S912 is an easy decision contrasted with the RK3328. Manufactured benchmarks don’t consistently mean genuine execution however they’re a great way of showing execution contrasts between various chipsets.

I’ve run various famous benchmarks on both RK3328 and Amlogic S912 gadgets I’ve assessed to perceive how these two chipsets stack up, with normal scores being utilized. As you can find in the benchmark display under, the Amlogic S912 overall beats the Rockchip RK3328 with basic leads in both CPU and GPU benchmarks.

Strangely, the Rockchip RK3328 performed around 15% better in Geekbenchs single-center benchmark. Be that as it may, multi-center execution was somewhat better as marry anticipate that thanks should 4 extra low power centers in the S912.

As far as GPU execution, the Amlogic S912 fundamentally beats the Rockchip RK3328 affirming what I’ve experienced while doing my gaming In both the benchmarks 3DMarks Ice Storm Unlimited and Ice Storm Extreme, I saw the graphical presentation of the RK3328 by the Amlogic S912 on 2.4 to 2.6 occasions. When it comes to video playback execution, both the Amlogic S912 and Rockchip RK3328 are practically on equivalent balance, with astounding video playback support including both 4K and HDR recordings.